Stewart v. Mathews et al
Plaintiff: Cedric C. Stewart
Defendant: Officer John Doe, Officer Jeremy Mathews and Officer Hollis
Case Number: 4:2019cv00120
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Glen H Davidson
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Officer Jeremy Mathews and Officer Hollis (jla)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Solomon M. Radner on behalf of Cedric C. Stewart (Radner, Solomon)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Solomon M. Radner is hereby admitted as counsel pro hac vice on behalf of the Plaintiff. Newly admitted counsel shall register as a user of the court's electronic filing system by August 27, 2019 at www.msnd.uscourts.gov/ecf. No further written order shall issue from the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 08/22/19. (bfg)(no document attached)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 EXHIBIT re #3 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice . (Burns, Christopher) Modified on 8/21/2019 to link to motion (jwr).
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; Attorney Solomon M. Radner,(Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 0537-1710494) by Cedric C. Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (Burns, Christopher)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Officer Hollis, Officer Jeremy Mathews. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1710279, filed by Cedric C. Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jwr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Mathews et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Jeremy Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Hollis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedric C. Stewart
Represented By: Christopher Ryan Burns
Represented By: Solomon M. Radner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?