Maggett v. Middlebrooks et al
Ladell Maggett |
Scott Middlebrooks and Attorney General Jim Hood |
4:2019cv00130 |
August 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Greenville Division Office |
Sharion Aycock |
Jane M Virden |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #6 Order, Set Deadlines, Terminate Motions. (jla) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Order, Set Deadlines, Terminate Motions, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Acknowledgment filed by Jim Hood, Scott Middlebrooks. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING State to Respond, Jim Hood answer due 12/23/2019; Ladell Maggett answer due 12/23/2019.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/7/19. (jla) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ladell Maggett. (jla) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 Order. (jla) |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring the petitioner to pay the filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis request including inmate account information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 8/30/19. (jla) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Bolivar County), filed by Ladell Maggett. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.