Williams v. Saul
| Linda Jones Williams |
| Andrew Saul and c/o Civil Process Cl U. S. Attorney |
| 4:2020cv00163 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward J. Bogen, Jr on behalf of Linda Jones Williams (Bogen, Edward) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION re #4 Summons Returned Executed: Docket does not reflect an issued summons for Civil Process Clerk, United States Attorney's Office; Further, the attached document is an unissued summons. Any request for issuance of summons should be sent to ecf_information@msnd.uscourts.gov. (jwr) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward J. Bogen, Jr on behalf of Linda Jones Williams c/o Civil Process Cl U. S. Attorney served on 11/9/2020. (Bogen, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General only. Returned to attorney for service. (jwr) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Andrew Saul (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1851862, filed by Linda Jones Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
