Pollard v. Coahoma County, Mississippi et al
| Myron Pollard |
| Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Eddie Earl, John and Jane Does 1-10 and Coahoma County, Mississippi |
| 4:2020cv00166 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Glen H Davidson |
| Jane M Virden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Juan T. Williams on behalf of All Plaintiffs Associated Cases: 4:20-cv-00166-GHD-JMV, 4:20-cv-00176-GHD-JMV (Williams, Juan) |
Filing 13
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1: Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/30/2020. Associated Cases: 4:20-cv-00166-GHD-JMV, 4:20-cv-00176-GHD-JMV (irw)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting (10) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 4:20-cv-00166-GHD-JMV. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/30/20. Associated Cases: 4:20-cv-00166-GHD-JMV, 4:20-cv-00176-DMB-JMV (jla)
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION re #8 Answer to Complaint; L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2)(A) states that the court will not recognize a motion included within the body of the answer, but only those raised by separate filing. Attorney to file Motion to Dismiss separate from Answer. (jla) |
| Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden: Status Conference held on 10/19/2020. (irw) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Coahoma County, Mississippi, Eddie Earl. (Tarpley, Bethany) |
| NOTICE of Conference: #9 Status Conference RESET for 10/19/2020 at 02:30 PM via Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Dial-in information remains the same. (irw) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Conference: Status Conference set for 10/16/2020 at 10:30 AM via Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Dial-in information provided on the notice. (irw) |
| Filing 8 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Coahoma County, Mississippi, Eddie Earl. (Tarpley, Bethany) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bethany A. Tarpley on behalf of Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Coahoma County, Mississippi, Eddie Earl (Tarpley, Bethany) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel J. Griffith on behalf of Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Coahoma County, Mississippi, Eddie Earl (Griffith, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Keith Perry, Jr on behalf of Myron Pollard Eddie Earl served on 9/25/2020. (Perry, John) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Keith Perry, Jr on behalf of Myron Pollard Coahoma County Sheriff's Office served on 9/23/2020. (Perry, John) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Keith Perry, Jr on behalf of Myron Pollard Coahoma County, Mississippi served on 9/23/2020. (Perry, John) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Coahoma County, Mississippi, Eddie Earl; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1852456, filed by Myron Pollard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
