Mid Valley Pipeline Company, LLC v. Rodgers et al
Mid Valley Pipeline Company, LLC |
David T. Cochran, Jr., Katherine Crump, Nott Wheeler, Jr., Roy Nichols, Paul Hollis, Hank Burdine and Peter Nimrod |
Kenneth Rodgers |
4:2022cv00025 |
February 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
David A Sanders |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Kenneth Rodgers, Paul Hollis, David T. Cochran, Jr, Nott Wheeler, Jr, Hank Burdine, Katherine Crump, Roy Nichols, Peter Nimrod. (Douglas, Heath) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Kenneth Rodgers, David T. Cochran, Jr., Katherine Crump, Nott Wheeler, Jr., Roy Nichols, Paul Hollis, Hand Burdine, and Peter Nimrod. (jla) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE STATEMENT . (Smith, William) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Mandatory Electronic Case Filing as to Christina Marie Nunez (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2061589, filed by Mid Valley Pipeline Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.