Shams v. Delta State University et al
| Mansoor Shams |
| Delta State University and William N. LaForge |
| 4:2022cv00035 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joel Frank Dillard on behalf of Mansoor Shams William N. LaForge served on 5/5/2022. (Dillard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joel Frank Dillard on behalf of Mansoor Shams Delta State University served on 5/5/2022. (Dillard, Joel)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Delta State University and William N. LaForge (jla)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Delta State University, William N. LaForge. E-mailed to attorney for service. (tab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2068135, filed by Mansoor Shams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit 2 Notice of Right To Sue, #3 Exhibit 3 Performance Improvement Plan, #4 Exhibit 4 Notice of Nonrenewal, #5 Exhibit 5 Resignation, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab)
|
|
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge David Sanders. (tab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
