Sutton v. Fitch et al
Sedric Q. Sutton |
Lynn Fitch, Charlton Smith, Dwight Donham and Hon. Margaret Carey-McCray |
4:2022cv00114 |
July 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
David A Sanders |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Lynn Fitch. (Minor, Wilson) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Margaret Carey-McCray served on 8/16/2022; Dwight Donham served on 8/23/2022; Lynn Fitch served on 8/12/2022; Charlton Smith served on 8/23/2022. (jwr) |
Filing 8 Joint and Separate ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Dwight Donham, Charlton Smith. (Dambrino, Robert) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Margaret Carey-McCray. (Dambrino, Robert) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Margaret Carey-McCray. (Dambrino, Robert) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Lynn Fitch, Charlton Smith, Dwight Donham, and Hon. Margaret Carey-McCray (jla) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants; handed to plaintiff for service. (jla) |
Filing 2 Consent to Receive Documents Electronically (jla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 329052, filed by Sedric Q. Sutton. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.