Lenoir v. Grenada Railroad, LLC et al
Bryant Lenoir |
Grenada Railroad, LLC, American Rail Partners, LLC, RailUSA, LLC, Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC, MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP, MIP V Rail, LLC and Tracy Pegram |
4:2022cv00130 |
August 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Glen H Davidson |
Jane M Virden |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; Tracy Pegram waiver sent on 9/8/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed) Grenada Railroad, LLC answer due 11/7/2022; MIP V Rail, LLC answer due 11/7/2022; Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC answer due 11/7/2022; RailUSA, LLC answer due 11/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 09/23/2022. (nih) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed) by Grenada Railroad, LLC, MIP V Rail, LLC, Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC, RailUSA, LLC. (Meyer, Christopher) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE of Past Due Answer as to American Rail Partners, LLC (jla) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Grenada Railroad, LLC answer due 9/27/2022; MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP answer due 9/27/2022; MIP V Rail, LLC answer due 9/27/2022; Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC answer due 9/27/2022; Tracy Pegram answer due 9/27/2022; RailUSA, LLC answer due 9/27/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 9/14/2022. (bbf) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed ; MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP waiver sent on 9/8/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir RailUSA, LLC served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir MIP V Rail, LLC served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir Grenada Railroad, LLC served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adam Holt Johnson on behalf of Bryant Lenoir American Rail Partners, LLC served on 8/17/2022. (Johnson, Adam) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Grenada Railroad, LLC, MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP, MIP V Rail, LLC, Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC, Tracy Pegram, RailUSA, LLC. (Meyer, Christopher) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to American Rail Partners, LLC, Grenada Railroad, LLC, MIP Infrastructure Partners V, LP, MIP V Rail, LLC, Macquarie Infrastructure Partners V GP, LLC, Tracy Pegram, RailUSA, LLC; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2130509, filed by Bryant Lenoir. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.