Trotter v. Loden et al
Leon Lamar Trotter |
Chad Loden and Lynn Fitch |
4:2023cv00002 |
January 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
Jane M Virden |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Leon Lamar Trotter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - PCR hearing transcript) (Boone, Walter) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #4 Order, Set Deadlines, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Exhibits to Other Document, #2 Exhibits to Other Document Acknowledgment filed by Lynn Fitch, Chad Loden. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING State to Respond re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Leon Lamar Trotter. Lynn Fitch answer due 4/4/2023; Chad Loden answer due 4/4/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 1/19/23. (cb) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Ct of App opinion. (Lowry, Andy) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - PCR Order. (Lowry, Andy) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 329503.)(Humphreys County), filed by Leon Lamar Trotter. (cb) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Virden. (cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.