Wagers v. Renasant Bank et al
| Cecil Joseph Wagers |
| Renasant Bank and Postal Inspection Dept |
| 4:2023cv00068 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Pro Se Address by Cecil Joseph Wagers; document submitted electronically (tab) Modified on 5/25/2023 (jla). |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders; document submitted electronically. (tab) Modified on 5/25/2023 (jla). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cecil Joseph Wagers; document submitted electronically. (tab) Modified on 5/25/2023 (jla). |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 Order; document submitted electronically. (tab) Modified on 5/25/2023 (jla). |
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Complete and Return In Forma Pauperis Application, Authorization and Certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 4/12/2023. (tab)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge David Sanders. (tab) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT challenging conditions of confinement,, filed by Cecil Joseph Wagers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A MDOC Memo) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
