Hanktem v. City of Indianola, Mississippi
Plaintiff: Jessie Hanktem
Defendant: City of Indianola, Mississippi
Case Number: 4:2023cv00151
Filed: August 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Debra M Brown
Referring Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Indianola, Mississippi. (Griffith, Mary)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #12 Initial Order - Rule 16.1 by Jessie Hanktem. (jla)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #12 Initial Order - Rule 16.1 by Jessie Hanktem. (lgm)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 11/28/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. Confidential memos and a jointly proposed Case Management Order due no later than 11/14/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 8/28/2023. (irw) (Main Document 12 replaced to correct date of Order on 8/29/2023) (irw).
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Indianola, Mississippi. (Griffith, Mary)
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Indianola, Mississippi. (Griffith, Mary)
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mary McKay Griffith on behalf of City of Indianola, Mississippi (Griffith, Mary)
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel J. Griffith on behalf of City of Indianola, Mississippi (Griffith, Daniel)
August 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jla)
August 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed City of Indianola, Mississippi served on 8/21/2023. (jwr)
August 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to City of Indianola, Mississippi. Forwarded to USM for service. (jwr)
August 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 8/11/2023. (jwr)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessie Hanktem. (lgm)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Virden. (lgm)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jessie Hanktem. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lgm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanktem v. City of Indianola, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Hanktem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Indianola, Mississippi
Represented By: Daniel J. Griffith
Represented By: Mary McKay Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?