Galvan et al v. Mississippi Power Company et al
Alfonso Galvan, Diana Galvan, David Guillen, Perfecto Aguirre, Samuel Morfin and Sanchez |
Mississippi Power Company, Southern Company Services, Inc., Pic Group, Inc. and Harsco Corporation |
1:2010cv00159 |
April 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Southern Office |
Jackson |
Halil S. Ozerden |
John M. Roper |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 306 ORDER denying 304 Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part and denying in part 298 Motion for Preservation of Evidence; granting in part and denying in part 298 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on February 26, 2013. (KM) |
Filing 248 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 214 Motion to Compel and extending the parties' expert designation deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on November 20, 2012. (KM) |
Filing 197 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 166 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to LandCoast Insulation, Inc. A separate judgment will be entered herein. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/22/12 (scp) |
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendant Mississippi Power Company's 46 Motion to Strike and 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on November 24, 2010 (dsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.