Cases 1 - 10 of 183
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Berman v. Harsco Corporation
as 3:2022cv04173
Plaintiff:
Michael Berman
Defendant:
Harsco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bilka v. Harsco Rail
as 3:2021cv01404
Defendant:
Harsco Rail and Harsco Corporation
Plaintiff:
Larry Bilka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harsco Corporation v. OSHA, et al
as 20-3320
Respondent:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor and Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Petitioner:
Harsco Corporation
Harsco Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health, et al
as 20-13464
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Petitioner:
HARSCO CORPORATION
Mobile Abrasives, Inc., et al v. OSHA, et al
as 20-2416
Petitioner:
Mobile Abrasives, Inc. and Harsco Corporation
Respondent:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor and Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turner, Jr. et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv12458
Defendant:
Fort Kent Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Dunham-Bush, Inc., Parker-Hannafin Corporation as Successor to EIS Automotive Corporation, Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Turner and Donald Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
