Grose v. Napolitano et al
| Anthony T. Grose, Sr. |
| Janet Napolitano and John Stevian |
| 1:2011cv00227 |
| June 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Louis Guirola |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ORDER denying Plaintiff Anthony T. Grose, Sr.'s Motion 122 for Default Judgment and/or Alternatively Summary Judgment; overruling Plaintiff's objections in his Appeal 142 and affirming the decision of the Magistrate Judge; and granting Defendant John Stevian's Motion 124 to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 06/18/2013 (HM)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 99 Second Motion to have Defendants Served in their Individual Capacity. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/22/12 (RLW)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 62 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 64 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 65 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 66 Motion for Leave to File Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 07/16/2012 (Guirola, Louis)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
