Brown v. Fisher et al
| Eddie Joseph Brown |
| Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Maud Irby, Joe Errington, Katherine Blount, Marsal Turner, Jacqueline Banks, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Reed, Unknown Beasley and Unknown Smith |
| 1:2015cv00373 |
| November 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Greene |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Louis Guirola |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Ordered that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 2/2/17. (JCH)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 33 Report and Recommendations as the findings and conclusions of this Court; and Ordered that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is hereby revoked. The plaintiff must pay the Clerk of the Court the remainder of the required filing fee within thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 11/21/16. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER: Ordered that the claims against Defendant Maud Irby are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The remainder of this case shall proceed. Maud Irby terminated. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 1/20/16 (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
