Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Randle v. Reed et al
as 1:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Regina Reed and Katherine Blount
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasheed v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Anthony G. Beasley, Joshua Csaszar, Andrew C. Mills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Akeem Abdullah Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00901
Plaintiff:
Mario Terrell Rucker
Defendant:
Anthony Beasley, Pelicia Hall, Joshua Csaszar and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Reed et al
as 1:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Regina Reed and Katherine Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Melvin Perkins v. Van Arnold, et al
as 19-60396
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA REED, Captain, ELVIN WHITTAKER, Correctional Officer, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN LAMAR PERKINS
Littleton v. Denmark et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Merlin Littleton, Sr.
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark, Katherine Blount, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Brown v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 16-60809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL FISHER, JERRY WILLIAMS, MAUD IRBY and others
Eddie Brown v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 16-60791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE JOSEPH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, MARSHAL TURNER, KATHERINE BLOUNT and others
Chatman v. Turner et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neil Chatman
Defendant:
Unknown Turner, Katherine Blount, Joe Errington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahl v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Paul Dahl
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jacqueline Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
