Attia v. Wray et al
| Joel B. Attia |
| David Jackson, Unknown Biden, Delilah Sayer, Randy Neil, Paul Really, Tommy Dutton, Christopher Wray, Jerome Lorraine, FBI Government, Steve Havard, Tommy Stringfellow, Delilah Sayre, Darlene MacLamore Elhers and Jerry Minchew |
| 1:2021cv00178 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Letter from Joel B. Attia (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (PKS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* provisionally granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint and a written show cause by 7/6/21. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 6/9/21. (TS)
|
|
Filing 2
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joel B. Attia (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PKS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Unknown Biden, Tommy Dutton, Darlene MacLamore Elhers, FBI Government, Steve Havard, David Jackson, Jerome Lorraine, Jerry Minchew, Randy Neil, Paul Really, Delilah Sayer, Delilah Sayre, Tommy Stringfellow, Christopher Wray filed by Joel B. Attia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(PKS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
