Moore et al v. Jindal Tubular USA, LLC et al
John Robert Moore and Lori Herrmann Moore |
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC and Express Services, Inc. doing business as Express Employment Professionals |
1:2021cv00383 |
November 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Halil S Ozerden |
Robert H Walker |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Express Services, Inc. (McRaney, Trace) |
Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jindal Tubular USA, LLC (McDade, Matthew) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #17. The title of this document is incorrect. Counsel does not need to refile as the motion has been ruled on but counsel should title future filings correctly. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #18. Incomplete linkage made. This memorandum should have also been linked to motion #9 and #11. All related filings to motions (using the"Responses and Replies" category, with the exception of "Response to Order") should be linked back to the original motion. Court staff has made the correction.(wld) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #15 Response in Opposition to Motion, #14 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by John Robert Moore, Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) Modified on 1/18/2022 to add links to motion #9 and motion #11 (wld). |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Memorandum of Law by John Robert Moore, Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #16. Incorrect document attached. Counsel should refile with the correct document attached. Document #16 will be terminated as a motion and should be disregarded. (wld) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Memorandums of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Responses #14 and #15 to Motions #9 and #11 to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall have an extension of one day to file their Memorandums. NO FURTHER ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT.Signed by District Judge Taylor B. McNeel on 1/14/2022. (MS) |
Filing 16 (DISREGARD)MOTION for Extension of Time to File One day extension by John Robert Moore, Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) Modified on 1/14/2022 (wld). |
Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Robert Moore, Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Robert Moore, Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) |
Docket Annotation as to Doc. #13. This docket entry fails to select all filing parties. Clerks office will edit this docket entry to include all appropriate filing parties. Attorney is directed to select all filing parties in future filings. (wld) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by John Robert Moore and Lori Herrmann Moore (Crosby, Michael) Modified on 1/4/2022 to add filer (wld). |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiffs shall have an additional ten days to respond to Defendants' #9 and #11 Motions to Dismiss. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Taylor B. McNeel on 1/3/2022. (MS) |
Docket Annotation as to Doc. #12. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings by also including an exhibit letter or number on the exhibit and in the description of each exhibit. (wld) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Express Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Release, #2 Exhibit Petition for authorization, #3 Exhibit Judgment)(McRaney, Trace) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Express Services, Inc. (McRaney, Trace) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jindal Tubular USA, LLC (McDade, Matthew) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Jindal Tubular USA, LLC (McDade, Matthew) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Bradley K. Donnell be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendant Express Services, Inc. in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 12/20/2021 (AB) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Bradley K. Donnell to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Express Services, Inc. (McRaney, Trace) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 7. Incorrect form used. Attorney is advised that the correct form can be found on the court website: www.mssd.uscourts.gov, under local rules and orders and it is listed as Form 6, Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The motion attached to this entry as the main document is not necessary. Attorney will not need to pay the fee again. The form should be saved correctly in pdf format so it is no longer a fillable form before being filed. Document # 7 will be disregarded on the docket. (JCH) |
Pro Hac Vice fee paid by Brad K. Donnell $ 100, receipt number 14643013901 (JCH) |
Filing 7 **DISREGARD** MOTION for Bradley K. Donnell to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Express Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verified application, #2 Exhibit certificate of good standing)(McRaney, Trace) Modified on 12/15/2021 (JCH). |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The deadline for Express Services, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 12/21/2021. NO FURTHER ORDER ISSUED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 12/14/21 (HM) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Halil S. Ozerden recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Taylor B. McNeel for all further proceedings Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 12/7/2021 (wld) |
Counsel should use the newly assigned Judge's initials on future filings. 1:21cv383TBM-RHWR. (wld) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Express Services, Inc. (McRaney, Trace) |
Filing 4 State Court Record by Defendant Jindal Tubular USA, LLC Volumes 1 (McDade, Matthew) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Jindal Tubular USA, LLC is granted an additional fourteen (14) days, or until December 21, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 12/2/21 (HM) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Jindal Tubular USA, LLC (McDade, Matthew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan C. Sawyers on behalf of Jindal Tubular USA, LLC (Sawyers, Bryan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jindal Tubular USA, LLC from Hancock County Circuit Court, case number 21-0159. Lower court jury demand. (Filing fee $ 402; receipt number 4715300) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court file, #2 Exhibit B - Consent to Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.