Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dedeaux v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
Hancock County, City of Bay St. Louis, MS, Anthony Gambino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jackson v. Jindal Tubular USA LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Harold Eugene Jackson
Defendant:
Jindal Tubular USA LLC and John Doe Employees 1,2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gammage v. Jindal Tubular USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Prentis Gammage
Defendant:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC and Express Services, Inc. doing business as Express Employment Professionals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moore et al v. Jindal Tubular USA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
John Robert Moore and Lori Herrmann Moore
Defendant:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC and Express Services, Inc. doing business as Express Employment Professionals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2021cv02073
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company and Jindal Tubular USA LLC
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC v. Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
as 2:2020mc00083
Defendant:
Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC v. Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
as 2:2020at00345
Defendant:
Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC v. Iconix Waterworks (US) Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00895
Defendant:
Corix Water Products (GP) Inc., Iconix Waterworks (US) Inc. and Corix Water Products Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC v. Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
as 3:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Jindal Tubular USA, LLC
Defendant:
Gilmore Pipe Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
