Roberts v. Coliant Solutions, Inc. et al
| Diane Roberts |
| Coliant Solutions, Inc., Mark Beard and John Does 1 through 5 |
| 2:2021cv00057 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Rebuttal re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice filed by Mark Beard (Warren, James) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #7 : Exhibits not properly identified. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #8 : Incorrect linkage made. All related filings to motions (using the "Responses and Replies" category, with the exception of "Response to Order") should be linked back to the original motion. Court staff has made the correction. (LDR) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #7 Response to Motion, re #2 Motion filed by Diane Roberts (Abston, Willie) Modified on 6/11/2021 (LDR). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice filed by Diane Roberts (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I)(Abston, Willie) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice. Response due by 6/10/2021. Reply due by 6/17/2021. No further written order shall issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 6/3/2021 (lm)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Diane Roberts (Abston, Willie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James W. Gunn, III on behalf of Mark Beard (Gunn, James) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER setting briefing schedule re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice filed by Mark Beard Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 5/21/2021 (lm)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice filed by Mark Beard (Warren, James) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims With Prejudice by Mark Beard (Warren, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Coliant Solutions, Inc. from Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, case number 18CI1:20-cv-00132. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0538-4533699) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 2021-04-06 Certified Copy of Records, #3 Exhibit B - 2021-04-02 Diane Roberts' Discovery Responses to Defendant (RFA), #4 Exhibit C - 2021-04-02 Diane Roberts' Discovery Responses to Defendant (RFA), #5 Complaint, #6 Summons Issued to Coliant Solutions, Inc. #7 Summons Issued to Mark Beard) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
