Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Beard et al v. Protective Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Mark Beard and Felicia Beard
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Beard v. Foremost Insurance Co Grand Rapids Michigan
as 3:2022cv03628
Plaintiff:
Mark Beard
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Co Grand Rapids Michigan
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BEARD et al
as 1:2021cv03269
Defendant:
MARK BEARD, US MARSHALS SERVICE, MARK M. BEARD and others
Claimant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Roberts v. Coliant Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Coliant Solutions, Inc., Mark Beard and John Does 1 through 5
Plaintiff:
Diane Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beard v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03519
Plaintiff:
Mark Beard, Sr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Beard
as 1:2015cv02231
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Champaigne et al
as 2:2014cv01349
Plaintiff:
John Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Greg Champaigne, Deputy Brossard, Sgt Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langlinais v. Nelson Coleman Correctional Center et al
as 2:2013cv03003
Plaintiff:
Louis Elais Langlinais, III
Defendant:
Nelson Coleman Correctional Center, Roland Ladyreth, Kenneth Decourte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcy Joseph, Jr. v. Nelson Coleman Corrtl Center, et al
as 10-31219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALCY JOSEPH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON COLEMAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, GREG CHAMPAGNE, Sheriff, St. Charles Parish, GEORGE BREEDY, Deputy, St. Charles Parish and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
