Pounds v. Rogersol, Inc., et al
John Pounds |
Rogersol, Inc., Harry H. Rogers Company, Inc., AGFA Corporation, Day International, Inc., Jell Chemicals, Inc., Hanco Chemicals, Inc., Fujifilm Graphic Systems U.S.A. Inc., ABV Graphics, Inc., Dixie Type & Supply Company, Inc., Jungkind Photo-Graphic, Inc., Heartland Imaging Companies, Inc., John Does Suppliers and John Doe Manufacturers |
3:2007cv00554 |
September 20, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Jackson Office |
Lincoln |
Linda R. Anderson |
William H. Barbour |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 51 Motion to Strike. To the extent the subject Motion sought summary judgment on the claims of failure to warn, strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and misrepresentation, the Motion is granted.To the extent the subject Motion sought summary judgment on the claim of wrongful death/loss of consortium, the Motion is denied. The stay entered in this case by United States Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson [Docket No. 50] is hereby vacated. In accordance with that Order, the parties are directed to submit a proposed new scheduling order to Judge Anderson within ten days of the date this Opinion and Order is entered. Signed by District Judge William H. Barbour, Jr on 3-5-09 (Lewis, Nijah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.