Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Graham et al v. Sun Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01362
Defendant:
Anchor/Lith-kem-ko Inc, Day International Inc, American Offset Printing Ink Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis D Graham and Shirley Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Kloehn v. Carter Day International, Inc.
as 0:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randal Kloehn
Defendant:
Carter Day International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuman v. Varn International, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Michele Schuman
Defendant:
Varn International, Inc., Day International, Inc., Flint Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pounds v. Rogersol, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv00554
Plaintiff:
John Pounds
Defendant:
Rogersol, Inc., Harry H. Rogers Company, Inc., AGFA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAY INTERNATIONAL V REEVES BROTHERS
as 00-1505
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
REEVES BROTHERS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
