Gilliam v. McMillian et al
Walter Louis Gilliam |
Malcolm McMillian, Copral Brown, Mary Rushing, Dotson, White, Rose Wilson and Scott |
3:2009cv00099 |
February 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
Hinds |
Daniel P. Jordan |
James C. Sumner |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/12/12 (dfk) |
Filing 16 FINAL ORDER to Show Cause: ORDERED that Plaintiff respond to this order to show cause, in writing, on or before October 9,2009, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's June 16, 2009 and August 5, 2009 orders. That Plaintiff comply with the June 16, 2009 order 11 on or before October 9, 2009, by filing a written response to: specifically state how Defendant Sheriff Malcolm McMillian violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights; provide this Court wit h the full name of Defendant Corporal Brown; provide this Court with the full name of Defendant Deputy Dotson; provide this Court with the full name of Defendant Deputy White; and provide this Court with the full name of Defendant Corporal Scott and specifically state how Defendant Corporal Scott violated Plaintiff's constitutional rights. Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Sumner on 9/24/09 (MGB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.