Dixon v. Mississippi Department of Correction Officials et al
Kenneth Dixon |
Mississippi Department of Correction Officials, Brian Lander, N. Webb, F. Morris, Sean Smith, P. Johnson, A. Arnold, David Petrie and T. Shepherd |
3:2009cv00251 |
April 20, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
Rankin |
Linda R. Anderson |
Henry T. Wingate |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 Memorandum Opinion and Order re: Bench Trial held on 7/18/2011. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice, and Final Judgment in favor of Defendants shall be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 7/26/2011. (ACF) |
Filing 70 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court granted Defendant Felicia Morris's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed the Complaint against her with prejudice. The Court granted the 59 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Patrici a Johnson and David Petrie and dismissed the Complaint against them with prejudice. The Court denied the 59 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Alice Arnold, Sean Smith, and Brian Ladner, and an evidentiary hearing shall be scheduled on Plaintiff's claims against them. The Court dismissed the Complaint against unserved Defendant Dr. Nikesha Webb; no further attempts to serve process on her shall be allowed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 1/23/2010 (ACF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.