Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Martinez (PS) v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv03931
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Martinez
Defendant:
Sean Smith, Higgins, Boudreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sean Smith v. LoopMe, Inc.
as 5:2026cv04813
Plaintiff:
Sean Smith
Defendant:
LoopMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: Aaron Mazie
as 26-2529
Petitioner:
In re: AARON CORBIN MAZIE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SEAN SMITH and DISCOVER BANK
The I.A.T.S.E. Local 6 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Klance Staging, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00958
Plaintiff:
THE I.A.T.S.E. LOCAL 6 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, THE I.A.T.S.E. LOCAL 6 PROFIT SHARING TRUST FUND, THE I.A.T.S.E. LOCAL 6 TRAINING TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
Klance Staging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Morrow v. Whitworth et al
as 5:2026cv00196
Plaintiff:
Sandy Morrow
Defendant:
Chris Whitworth, Elijah McPherson, Brian Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Skeens et al
as 5:2026cv00158
Plaintiff:
Sandy Morrow
Defendant:
Willie Skeens, Attorney Chris Whitworth, Admin Brian Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Skeens et al
as 5:2026cv00136
Plaintiff:
Sandy Morrow
Defendant:
Sheriff Willie Skeens, Attorney Chris Whitworth, Admin Brian Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EMERALD X, LLC v. SMITH et al
as 2:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
EMERALD X, LLC
Defendant:
SEAN SMITH and DIVERSIFIED COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Sanford v. Joseph et al
as 3:2025cv00702
Plaintiff:
Nathan Sanford
Defendant:
Christopher Joseph, Parsons, Tone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
