Striker v. Longley
Plaintiff: Duffy Lynn Striker
Defendant: Archie B. Longley
Case Number: 3:2016cv00519
Filed: June 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Yazoo
Presiding Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Daniel P. Jordan
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 20 of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. The Petition is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 06/15/2018.(VM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Striker v. Longley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duffy Lynn Striker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Archie B. Longley
Represented By: Marc A. Perez - Federal Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?