Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Bouterse v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Paula A. Wolff, Archie B. Longley, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Dino Delano Bouterse
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney Fred A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stokes v. Longley et al
as 3:2018cv00847
Defendant:
Officer A. Gibson, Warden Archy B. Longley, Warden S. Mosely and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lamond Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2017cv02133
Petitioner:
Leonardo Williams
Respondent:
Herbert H. Slatery, III and Archie B Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Striker v. Longley
as 3:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
Duffy Lynn Striker
Defendant:
Archie B. Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haynes v. Longley
as 3:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Haynes
Defendant:
Archie B. Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wardell v. Executive Director, et al
as 16-1002
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDEL ROBERT WARDELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Colorado Dept. of Corrections, ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Stokes v. Longley et al
as 3:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lamond Stokes
Defendant:
Archy B. Longley, S. Mosely, A. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricardo Del Valle-Diaz v. USA, et al
as 15-60390
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO DEL VALLE-DIAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Yazoo City Low
Stokes v. Longley et al
as 1:2015cv01881
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lamond Stokes
Defendant:
Archy B. Longley, S. Mosely, A. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wardell v. Executive Director, et al
as 13-1339
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDEL ROBERT WARDELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Colorado Department of Corrections, ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
