Reese v. Parks et al
Howard Eugene Reese, II |
Deputy Warden Sheila Parks and MDOC |
Pro Se Department |
3:2021cv00697 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
Henry T Wingate |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Pro Se Office's Memorandum to Plaintiff, Howard Eugene Reese, II, acknowledging receipt of filing fee. (Attachments: #1 AO 440 Summons form, #2 AO 398 Notice form, #3 AO 399 Waiver form, #4 Rule 4) (CS) |
![]() |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 34643065462. (VM) |
Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2, Acknowledgement filed by Howard Eugene Reese, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 5 Change of Address filed by Howard Eugene Reese, II. Address updated on docket: Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, 2999 US HWY 61 N, Woodville, MS 39669. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Howard Eugene Reese, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MDOC, Sheila Parks, filed by Howard Eugene Reese, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.