Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Glenn v. Paul et al
as 2:2026cv00159
Plaintiff:
Laron James Glenn #373892
Defendant:
Unknown Paul, MDOC Medical Provider and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McLemore v. MDOC et al
as 2:2026cv12386
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ray McLemore
Defendant:
MDOC, Corizon Medical and Brooks Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shows v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv00185
Petitioner:
Tony Shows
Respondent:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and MDOC Records Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn v. Paul et al
as 2:2026cv12208
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Glenn
Defendant:
Paul, MDOC Medical Provider and John Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Robert Dykes-Bey v. Emily Cecil, et al
as 26-1567
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DYKES-BEY
Defendant:
EMILY CECIL, Dietitian, KELLY M. WELLMAN, Dietitian, MARY VELARDE, R.N. and others
Aaron Meier v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 26-2138
Petitioner:
Aaron Edward Meier
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe, Director MDOC and Chris Degase, Sheriff Douglas County
Lamont Heard v. Adrian Dirschell, et al
as 26-1514
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BERNARD HEARD
Defendant:
ADRIAN DIRSCHELL, Special Activity Coordinator, in individual and official capacity, JEREMY BUSH, MDOC Deputy Director, in individual and official capacity and WILLIS CHAPMAN, MDOC Deputy Director, in individual and official capacity
Green v. MDOC Healthcare
as 2:2026cv11912
Plaintiff:
Virgil Maurice Green
Defendant:
MDOC Healthcare
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Derrick Smith v. Michigan State Police, et al
as 26-1485
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant:
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE, named as Department of Michigan State Police, PATRICIA PENMAN, Detective for Wayne County, JOE NORMANDIN, Detective Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
