Alba v. Randle et al
| Paul Alba, Jr. |
| Delores Randle, Mike Morris, Bruce Pearson, Delbert G. Sauers, Unknown Dawson, J. Fuqua, Ayanna Brown and John Does |
| 5:2010cv00049 |
| April 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| David C. Bramlette |
| David C. Bramlette |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER granting 66 Motion to Dismiss; granting 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part 154 Report and Recommendations; denying 170 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 170 Objections to Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 09/29/2011 (ECW)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER: plaintiff is ordered to pay appellate filing fee of $455.00 to the Clerk of Court within 30 days from date of this Order. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 8/16/2011 (ECW)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER denying 128 Motion (Request) for Clerk's Record; denying 135 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 8/3/2011 (ECW)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER denying 38 Motion for TRO; denying 45 Motion for reconsideration; adopting 63 Report and Recommendations; denying 70 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 03/28/2011 (ECW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
