Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Brown v. Morris et al
as 2:2025cv04739
Plaintiff:
Khadeem Brown
Defendant:
Officer Mike Morris, Officer Christopher Costa and JOHN AND JANE DOE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Eckstein v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2024cv01301
Defendant:
Stephen R Whittington, Curry County Detention Center, FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Staci-Almeda Eckstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Apodaca et al v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Defendant:
FNU Cox/Cook, Megan Palla, Helen Casaus and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Ben Albert, Dr Victor Andrew Apodaca, Sr and Daniel Julian Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval Samudio v. Morris
as 1:2022cv05170
Plaintiff:
Juan Luis Sandoval Samudio
Defendant:
Mike Morris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lyon v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2020cv01883
Defendant:
Derek Wehr, Patrick Allen, Mike Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44772
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Harris v. Mike Morris, et al
as 17-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ISAAC HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE MORRIS, MARY TREDER, DENNIS M. BEAGEN and others
THOMAS v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00461
Defendant:
BRAD ANDERSON, JUDY ANDERSON, MARK D. BIRD and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
