DeCaro v. USA
Petitioner: Richard DeCaro
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:1998cv00112
Filed: October 5, 1998
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
Presiding Judge: Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Reopen Case pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Petitioner Richard DeCaro; motion is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/17/14. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeCaro v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard DeCaro
Represented By: Michael A. Gross
Represented By: Dallas Craig Hughes
Represented By: Steven J. Rozan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Thomas E. Dittmeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?