Taylor v. United States of America
1:2006cv00182 |
December 11, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Charles A. Shaw |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 53 PRO SE MOTION filed by Petitioner Eddie Taylor, Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Eddie Taylor, Jr.s Motion for Relief from Judgment and Order Pursuant to Rule 60(d)(1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas motion. [Doc. 53]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/24/14. (MRS) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..DENYING AS MOOT re: 9 MOTION for Hearing /MOTION for Ruling filed by Eddie Taylor, Jr.,DENYING AS MOOT 10 MOTION for Leave to filed by Eddie Taylor, Jr.,....DENYING 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) f iled by Eddie Taylor, Jr. motion is DENIED...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Eddie Taylor, Jr. as not made a substantial showing ofthe denial of a constitutional right, and therefore this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 1-0/17/08. (MRS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.