Williamson et al v. New Madrid, City of et al
| Derrick Williamson |
| New Madrid, City of, Chris Hensley, Danny Ware, J. Hill, Chris Henry, Claude McFerren, Mark Baker and Lewis Recker |
| 1:2009cv00013 |
| February 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| New Madrid |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 34 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Plaintiff Derrick Williamson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to reopen his § 1983 action is GRANTED and the stay of this action is lifted. [Doc. 34]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is subject to dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's supplemental state law claims will be dismissed without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/20/14. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER STAYING CASE.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Chris Hensley, Defendant J. Hill motion is DENIED...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending finalresolution of the crimi nal case pending against plaintiff in State v. Williamson, Nos. 08MICR00530, 08MI-CR00531 (33rd Judicial Circuit, Mississippi County, State of Missouri), and any appeal therefrom, as set forth herein.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing concerning the final resolution of the criminal case pending against him in State v. Williamson, Nos. 08MICR00530, 08MI-CR00531 (33rd Judicial Circuit, Mississippi County, State of Missouri), and any appeal therefrom, within 30 d ays after such final resolution. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is administratively closed pending final resolution of the criminal case against plaintiff, and any appeal therefrom, and may be reopened by plaintiffs filing of a motion to reopen the case after such final resolution. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 2/5/10. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re 22 Motion filed by Derrick Williamson...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Denial of Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Leave of the Court to File Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Exceeding 15 Pages is DENIED. [Doc. 22] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file his response to the defendants motion for summary judgment by October 8, 2009. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 9/22/09. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's reply to the defendants' answer is STRICKEN from the record of this case. [Doc. 15]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall delete from the record of this matter Document 15, plaintiff's reply to the defendants' answer (docketed as Traverse re Answer to Complaint).. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 05/27/2009. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Derrick Williamson motion is DENIED. Signed by Mag Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 04/07/2009. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..granting MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Derrick Williamson..IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $3.64 within thirty (30) day s of the date of this Order. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/18/2009.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed witho ut prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Chris Hensley and J. Hill. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2),defendants Chris Hens ley and J. Hill shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants City of New Madrid, Danny Ware, Chris Henry, Claude M cFerren, Mark Baker, or Lewis Recker because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: PrisonerStandard. Signed by Honorable Stephen N Limbaugh, Jr on 2/19/09. (MRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
