Yeargain v. Summit Tree Stands et al
Plaintiff: Galen Yeargain
Defendant: Summit Tree Stands and Outdoor Hunting Supplies, INC.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00170
Filed: December 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Bollinger
Presiding Judge: Lewis M. Blanton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendant Summit Treestands, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 31) be and it is granted. A separate Summary Judgment will be entered on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Summit&# 039;s Motion to Reconsider the Memorandum and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Leave of this Court to Reopen Expert Discovery (Doc. No. 56) be and it is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (Doc. No. 61) be and it is denied.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that defendant's request for attorney's fees, expenses, and costs (Doc. No. 66) be and it is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 3/27/12.(MRS)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 51 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 49 Memorandum & Order, filed by Plaintiff Galen Yeargain motion is GRANTED...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to conduct further discovery including any investigation and testing by his expert Mr. Johanson, and to providea supplemental report to both Defendant Summit and the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Summit is granted thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of plaintiffs supplemental report in which to conduct any further discover related to the supplemental report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 11/15/11. (MRS)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: MOTION to Exclude filed by Defendant Summit Treestands, LLC motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the interest of justice, plaintiff will be granted ten (10) days in which to request an additional thirty (30) days to remedy the deficiency in Mr. Johansons testimony. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 10/13/11. (MRS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yeargain v. Summit Tree Stands et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Galen Yeargain
Represented By: John R. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit Tree Stands
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Outdoor Hunting Supplies, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?