Benford v. Correctional Medical Services et al
| Terry Lewis Benford |
| Correctional Medical Services, Dunklin County Justice Center, Rod Harvegrove, Billy Hopper, Willie Moore, Malden Police Department, Durren Dixon and Jarrett Bullock |
| 1:2010cv00150 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Dunklin |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Terry Lewis Benford motion is GRANTED( Initial Partial Filing Fee of $31.78 due by 12/22/2010.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defen dants Dunklin County Justice Center Medical Department, Rod Hargrove, Billy Hopper, Willie Moore, and Correctional Medical Service are DISMISSED without prejudice, because they are not properly joined in this action under Rule 20(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as to defendants Malden Police Department, Durren Dixon, and Jarrett Bullock, the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue, because the complaint is legally frivolous and fails to state aclaim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #5] is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/22/10. (MRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
