American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. v. Roofers Mart, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc.
Defendant: John E. Slattery, Bernard S. Miller, Jr., Lucas Y. Abbott, Mark E. Lineberry, Daniel Woodall, Steven G. DeClue, Roofers Mart, Inc. and Michael L. Burger
Case Number: 1:2011cv00019
Filed: February 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Cape Girardeau
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 145 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 131 MOTION to Bifurcate filed by Defendant Roofers Mart, Inc., Defendant Bernard S. Miller, Jr. motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 8/17/2012. (JMC)
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 138 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 126 MOTION to Sever filed by Defendant Roofers Mart, Inc. motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 8/15/12. (MRS)
July 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 112 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Bernard Miller for summary judgment [Doc. #58] is granted as to the claims of breach of fiduciary duty in Count III and unfair competition in Count IV. The motion is denied as t o the claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in Counts I, breach of contract in Count II, breach of duty of loyalty in Count III, and civil conspiracy in Count V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Roofers Mart for summary judgme nt [Doc. #56] is granted as to the claim of unfair competition in Count IV and civil conspiracy to misappropriate trade secrets in Count V. The motion is denied as to the claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in Count I, civil conspiracy to breach contract in Count V, and tortious interference in Count VI. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/24/2012. (JMC)
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 79 MOTION for Sanctions for spoliation of evidence filed by Plaintiff American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for sanctions [Doc. #79] isgranted with re spect to the request for an adverse inference jury instruction as to defendant Bernard Miller and the request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for sanctions is denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until August 3, 2012, to submit a verified statement of the attorneys' fees and costs incurred in litigating the motion for sanctions. Objections, if any, must be filed not later than fifteen (15) days after submission of the verified statement. (Response to Court due by 8/3/2012.) Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/20/12. (CSG)
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants Bernard Miller and Roofers Mart to strike plaintiff's motion for sanctions and the affidavit of expert John Clingerman [Doc. #91] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that th e defendants' alternative request for leave to conduct additional limited discovery [Doc. #91] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deposition of plaintiff's expert witness John Clingerman shall be completed not later than June 26, 20 12. Defendants Miller and Roofers Mart, Inc., shall disclose the identity and produce the reports of their rebuttal expert witness(es), if any, not later than July 14, 2012. The deposition of any rebuttal expert witness must be completed not later than July 28, 2012. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 6/11/2012. (JMC)
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' motion to compel [Doc. #36] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to compel [Doc. #37] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for producing the documents required to be produced by this order is November 14, 2011. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 11/1/2011. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc. v. Roofers Mart, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Slattery
Represented By: James D. Bass
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bernard S. Miller, Jr.
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Represented By: James D. Bass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucas Y. Abbott
Represented By: James D. Bass
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark E. Lineberry
Represented By: James D. Bass
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Woodall
Represented By: James D. Bass
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven G. DeClue
Represented By: James D. Bass
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roofers Mart, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Represented By: James D. Bass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael L. Burger
Represented By: Nicole S. Zellweger
Represented By: James D. Bass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Builders & Contractors Supply Co., Inc.
Represented By: Gregory H. Revera
Represented By: John W. Grimm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?