Floyd v. United States of America
| Jeremy W. Floyd |
| Kathy Hollenbeck and U.S. Marshals on Duty of Day of Incident; Listed as John Doe 1 Thru 7 |
| 1:2011cv00065 |
| April 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Cape Girardeau |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant United States of America motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/20/13. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This matter is before the Court on remand from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, directing this Court to reopen this action and treat it as an action for return of property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure. As a result, the Court will order the Clerk to reopen this action and to substitute the United States of America as the sole defendant in this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall reopen this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall docket this action as Jeremy Floyd v. United States of America. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/15/2012. (JMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
