Nichols v. Alternative Opportunities, Inc.
| Carissa Nichols |
| Alternative Opportunities, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00079 |
| May 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Scott |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM... This Court finds that, despite offering plaintiff several opportunities to comply with deadlines and Court orders, plaintiff has been both willfully disobedient and that she has exhibited a pattern of intentional delay. Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed with prejudiced under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/7/2012. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall furnish those documents and things described above to defense counsel no later than August 28, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall, no later than August 28, 2012, commit to a mutually agreeable date to appear for her deposition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify the Court of her compliancewith this Order no later than August 29, 2012. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties may, after August 28, 2012, see k extension of discovery and other deadlines by motion if necessary. Failure to abide by this order will result in dismissal with prejudice of this matter pursuant to Rule 41(b). Response to Court due by 8/29/2012. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/12. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions, #15, is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Motion to Deem Admitted Defendant's First Request for Admissions, #23, is GRANTE D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve defendant with her supplemented Rule 26 disclosures, her responses to defendant's first interrogatories, and her responses to defendant's first request for production of documents by July 2, 2012. Plaintiff shall promptly notify the Court that she has complied with this order. Failure to comply may result in further sanctions, including dismissal of this action. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant's attorneys' fees and expenses in the amount of $5,000.00 no later than July 2, 2012. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/18/2012. (JMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nichols v. Alternative Opportunities, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carissa Nichols | |
| Represented By: | Jerald A. Hochsztein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alternative Opportunities, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
