Lilly v. Norman et al
Plaintiff: |
Jarrod Alexander Lilly |
Defendant: |
Jarrod Flood, Debbie Judy, Heather Cato, Warren Moore and Charles Reed |
Case Number: |
1:2011cv00088 |
Filed: |
May 18, 2011 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Office: |
Cape Girardeau Office |
County: |
Mississippi |
Presiding Judge: |
Henry E. Autrey |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 23, 2014 |
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to effectuate timely service of Defendants Dr. Jarrod Flood and Debbie Judy. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 1/23/14. (MRS)
|
January 31, 2013 |
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause why defendants Dr. Jarrod Flood and Debbie Judy should not be dismissed from this action without prejudice for lack of timely service. Show Cause Response due by 2/14/2013. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 1/31/2013. (JMC)
|
January 30, 2013 |
Filing
38
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss Party Healther Cato Annesser and Warren Moore filed by Defendant Heather Cato, Defendant Warren Moore motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 1/30/2013. (JMC)
|
March 23, 2012 |
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Sgt. Charles Reed's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED due to Plaintiff Jarrod Lilly's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies under the PLRA.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Sgt. Charles Reed shall be dismissed as a defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Reed's Motion to Dismiss[ECF No. 12] shall be DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 3/23/12. (MRS)
|
September 2, 2011 |
Filing
28
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 9/2/2011. (JMC)
|
June 1, 2011 |
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $18.75 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue pr ocess or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Cato, Moore, Flood, Judy, and Reed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Cato, Moore, Flood, Judy, and Reed shall reply to plaintiff' s claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Norman, N ovak, Hakala, Conley, or Roberts because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: PrisonerStandard. An appropriate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 7/1/2011.). Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 6/1/2011. (JMC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?