Mitchell et al v. Robinson et al
Jerry Mitchell, Irean Mitchell, Mq. R., M. R., Jr. and Mk. R. |
Marcus Tyrone Robinson, Sr. and Unilever, Inc. (FESCo.) |
1:2011cv00130 |
July 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Scott |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Unilever United States, Inc., Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/14/15. (MRS) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Unilever and Met Life's motion to dismiss, #27, is GRANTED, and Counts II, III, and IV of plaintiffs' second amended complaint are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall have until March 27,2012, to amend their complaint, should they choose to allege a further cause of action under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a). ( Response to Court due by 3/27/2012.). Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/13/12. (MRS) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..granting re: 7 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Jury Demand with respect to Count II filed by Defendant Unilever, Inc. (FESCo.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs jury demands with respect to Counts II and III of plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint are STRICKEN.. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/22/11. (MRS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.