Akens v. USA

Akens v. USA

Petitioner:	Joseph Allen Akens
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2011cv00186
Filed:	October 17, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Cape Girardeau Office
County:	Cape Girardeau
Presiding Judge:	Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 23, 2014	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 26 PRO SE MOTION Under Rule 60 (b)(2) filed by Petitioner Joseph Allen Akens motion is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(2) [ECF No. 26] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/23/14. (CSG)
May 9, 2013	Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Joseph Allen Akens' motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence in federal custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Akens' motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court will not issue a certificate of appealability, as Akens has not made a substantial showing of the denial fo a federal constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 5/9/2013. (JMC)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 23, 2014

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 26 PRO SE MOTION Under Rule 60 (b)(2) filed by Petitioner Joseph Allen Akens motion is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(2) [ECF No. 26] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/23/14. (CSG)

May 9, 2013

Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Joseph Allen Akens' motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence in federal custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Akens' motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court will not issue a certificate of appealability, as Akens has not made a substantial showing of the denial fo a federal constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 5/9/2013. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akens v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Keith D. Sorrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph Allen Akens
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?