Wilson v. Duckett Truck Center, Inc. et al
Dale Dakota Wilson |
Duckett Truck Center, Inc., Gene Russom and Megan Looney |
1:2012cv00085 |
May 24, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
Wayne |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Dale Dakota Wilson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/12/13. (CSG) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Megan Looney, Defendant Gene Russom. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Gene Russom and Megan Looney's motion to dismiss (#17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims against defendants Russom and Looney arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act are DISMISSED, and the case will proceed on plaintiff's claims under the MHRA against all defendants. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/31/13. (CSG) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Dale Dakota Wilson; motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/21/2012. (JMC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.