Yang v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Richard Yang
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi, John Doe, Tom Clements, Mariann Atwell, Patricia Cornell, Fred Johnson, Don Roper, Omer L. Clark, William (Bill) Stange, Allan Hughes, Angela Riddell, Dwayne Kempker, K. Malloy, G. Phagley and Cindy Griffin
Case Number: 1:2012cv00092
Filed: June 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 97 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.80 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 7/1/2015.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/1/15. (MRS)
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..granting 87 MOTION to Strike 85 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion Exhibit D (Document Number 85-4) filed by Defendants...granting 80 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/24/15. (MRS)
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Alter or Modify (#73) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Change Venue (#75) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/28/14. (MRS)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 54 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant John Doe, Defendant Allan Hughes, Defendant Tom Clements, Defendant Fred Johnson, Defendant Omer L. Clark, Defendant Angela Riddell, Defendant Don Roper, De fendant Cindy Griffin, Defendant William (Bill) Stange, Defendant Patricia Cornell, Defendant George Lombardi, Defendant K. Malloy, Defendant Mariann Atwell, Defendant Dwayne Kempker, Defendant G. Phagley. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant s' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54) GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants are granted Summary Judgment on plaintiff's First Amendment claim regarding his Chinese language mail. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/23/14. (CSG)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 40 PRO SE MOTION Issuance of Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall SHOW CAUSE by September 16, 2013, why plaintiff cannot be permitted the opportunity to obtain an affidavit or declaration fromSECC inmate Carlos Mendoza.( Show Cause Response due by 9/16/2013.). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/13. (MRS)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #15] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/18/2013. (JMC)
September 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 13 MOTION for Entry of Clerk's Default against filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for entry of default[Doc. #13] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/20/12. (CSG)
August 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang, 3 PRO SE MOTION Permission of Extension to File Filing Fees $350 filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang, 4 PRO SE MOTION Waive Service of Summons filed by Plaintiff Richard Yang. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #6] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee o f $1.95 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) t he case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants George Lombardi, Tom Clements, Mariann Atwell, Patricia Cornell, Fred Johnson, Don Roper, Omer Clark, William Strange, A llen Hughes, Angela Riddell, Dwayne Kemper, Jeff Norman, K. Malloy, G. Phaglay, Cindy Griffin. This defendants shall be served through the use of the waiver agreement the Clerk of Court maintains with the Missouri AttorneyGeneral's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants George Lombardi, Tom Clements, Mariann Atwell, Patricia Cornell, Fred Johnson, Don Roper, Omer Clark, William Strange, Allen Hughes, Angela Riddell, Dwayne Kemper, Jeff Norma n, K. Malloy, G. Phaglay, Cindy Griffin shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant the Missouri Department of Corrections because, as to this defendant, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that plaintiff's motion to waive service of summons [Doc. #4] is DENIED AS MOOT given that plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status and service will be effectuated on his behalf. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motio n for a two year extension to pay the filing fee [Doc. #3] is DENIED. Plaintiff will be required to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the Order set forth above. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). After payment of the initial partial filing fe e the Missouri Department of Corrections will forward payments from plaintiff's prisoner account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10, until the filing fees are paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)-(2). An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 9/17/2012.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/17/12. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yang v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Lombardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Clements
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mariann Atwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Cornell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omer L. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William (Bill) Stange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allan Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Riddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dwayne Kempker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Malloy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Phagley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cindy Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?