Williams et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Sybil Williams and Josh Norwood
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv00108
Filed: June 22, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Dunklin
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER: In accordance with the memorandum filed on this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (#24) is GRANTED. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of defendant Ford Motor Company and against plaintiffs. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/25/13. (CSG)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company; motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/25/13. (CSG)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 REPLY to Response to Motion re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 REPLY to Response to Motion re #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 RESPONSE to Motion re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment and memorandum and statement of additional facts filed by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Coroners Report, #2 Exhibit Ford Motor Credit Statement of Ownership, #3 Exhibit Bickenese Depo, #4 Exhibit Huffman Depo, #5 Exhibit Taylor Depo, #6 Exhibit Livingston Depo)(Moroni, Michael)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 RESPONSE to Motion re #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman filed by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Moroni, Michael)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #29 Second MOTION to Continue Response to Defendants Daubert Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Moroni, Michael) filed by Josh Norwood ; ORDERED GRANTED, ( Response to Court due by 6/12/2013.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/29/2013. (JMC)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Second MOTION to Continue Response to Defendants Daubert Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Moroni, Michael)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman, #23 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #25 Statement of Material Facts, #26 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Moroni, Michael) filed by Josh Norwood ; ORDERED GRANTED, ( Response to Court due by 5/29/2013.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/8/2013. (JMC)
May 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman, #23 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #25 Statement of Material Facts, #26 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Josh Norwood. (Moroni, Michael)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STATEMENT of Material Facts re #24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Livingston Deposition Excerpts)(Clark, Ryan)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert John Huffman by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Burrow Deposition Excerpts, #2 Exhibit B - Mauldin Affidavit, #3 Exhibit C - Taylor Affidavit, #4 Exhibit D - Huffman Deposition)(Clark, Ryan)
April 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER re #19 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Ford Motor Company GRANTED( Jury Trial set for 3/24/2014 09:00 AM in Southeast Div - Courtroom 4B before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.., Motion in Limine due by 3/14/2014., Pretrial Compliance due by 3/4/2014.). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/4/13. (MRS)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #19 MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION to Continue Trial by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice John Randolph Bibb, Jr.. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-3728594) by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Attachment to Verified Motion for Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Bibb, J.) filed by Ford Motor Company ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/19/2013. (JMC)
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice John Randolph Bibb, Jr.. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-3728594) by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Attachment to Verified Motion for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Bibb, J.)
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2 Standard Dispositive Motions due by 5/1/2013. Jury Trial set for 9/9/2013 09:00 AM in Southeast Div - Courtroom 4B before District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. Pretrial Compliance due by 8/20/2013. Motion in Limine due by 8/30/2013. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/4/2013. (JMC)
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendant Ford Motor Company. . (Reinbold, George)
November 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #7 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of Dunklin County filed by Plaintiff Sybil Williams motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/8/2012. (JMC)
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #12 MOTION to Substitute Attorney/Law Firm Lewis, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C. ;attorney or firm Ryan N. Clark ;substituted for:Peter B. Hoffman and Laura J. Bettenhausen by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan) filed by Ford Motor Company ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/11/2012. (JMC)
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Substitute Attorney/Law Firm Lewis, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C. ;attorney or firm Ryan N. Clark ;substituted for:Peter B. Hoffman and Laura J. Bettenhausen by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Clark, Ryan)
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Entry of Appearance: by Ryan Clark on behalf by Defendant Ford Motor Company (Clark, Ryan) Modified on 10/11/2012 (MRS).
August 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice George W. Reinbold, IV (Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-3431389) by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Reinbold, George) filed by Ford Motor Company ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/27/2012. (JMC)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice George W. Reinbold, IV (Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-3431389) by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Reinbold, George)
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit COurt of Dunklin County Reply in Support of Ford's Notice of Removal and Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Lassila Opinion - June 3, 1999, #2 Attachment Lassila Opinion - November 5, 1999)(Hoffman, Peter)
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit COurt of Dunklin County by Plaintiff Sybil Williams. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00108-SNLJ, 1:10-cv-00057-SNLJ(Moroni, Michael)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Laura J. Bettenhausen for Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Bettenhausen, Laura)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company Sent To: Dunklin County Circuit Court Executed by State Court Clerk (Hoffman, Peter)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Complaint (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Dunklin County, Missouri, filed by Ford Motor Company.(JMC)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh Jr.. (JMC)
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATION INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Publicly held company: State Street Corporation,. (Hoffman, Peter)
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-00108, 1:10-cv-00057-SNLJ(Hoffman, Peter)
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Dunklin County, case number 10DU-CC00026, with receipt number 0865-3341438, in the amount of $350 Jury Demand,, filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Original Filing Form, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoffman, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sybil Williams
Represented By: Inga H. Ladd
Represented By: Michael A. Moroni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josh Norwood
Represented By: Inga H. Ladd
Represented By: Michael A. Moroni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: George W. Reinbold, IV
Represented By: J. Randolph Bibb, Jr.
Represented By: Peter B. Hoffman
Represented By: Laura J. Gust
Represented By: Ryan N. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?