O'Connor v. Hutchesson et al
| James O'Connor |
| Danny Lafferty, John Hadenfeld, Beverly Starke, Cory Hutchesson, Charles Marcum, Janice McCameron and Danny Bright |
| 1:2012cv00192 |
| November 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Mississippi |
| Lewis M. Blanton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Cory Hutchesson, Charles Marcum, John Hadenfeld, Danny Bright, and Janice McCameron is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 35.)All claims against all parties having been resolved, a separate Judgment shallaccompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/23/14. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ninety (90) days of February 20, 2013, plaintiff shall file a motion to substitute under Fed.R.Civ.P. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ninety (90) days of February 20, 2013, in addition to f iling a motion to substitute the proper party, plaintiff shall also provide the Court an address at which the new party may be served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs failure to comply with thisCourt Memorandum and Order will result in a dismissal of this action againstBeverly Starke. Response to Court due by 5/21/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 3/8/13. (MRS) Modified on 3/8/2013 (MRS).
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #7] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach plaintiff's amended complaint from Docket No. 4 and file it s eparately under the heading Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Hutchesson, Marcum, Hadenfeld, Bright, McCameron, Starke and Lafferty, in their indi vidual capacities, with respect to their alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Hutchesson, Marcum, Hadenfeld, Bright, McCameron, Starke and Laffe rty shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the co mplaint as to defendants Moore or Cann because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint fails to state a claim uponwhich relief can be granted as to defendants Hutchesson, Marcum, Hadenfeld, Bright, McCameron, Starke and Lafferty, in their official capacities. As such, process shall not be issued on these defendants in their official capacities.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at plaintiff's claims for conspiracy to have him beaten up/failure to protect him against defendants Hutchesson and Bright aresubject to dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment ofcounsel [Doc. #5] is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/29/13. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy ofthe Courts form Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Prisoner Cases.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint onthe Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that his amended complaint will take the place of his original complaint and will be the only pleading that this Court will review.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $350 filing feeor submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of thi s Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for noncompliance with this Order, the dismissal will not constitute a strike under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g). Response to Court due by 12/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 11/26/12. (MRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
