Harker v. Jordan et al
| Jeffrey A. Harker |
| John Jordan, Ruth A. Dickerson, Bud Proffer, James Mulcahy and T. C. Stevens |
| 1:2014cv00005 |
| January 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Cape Girardeau |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment Renewed filed by Defendant T. C. Stevens, Defendant James Mulcahy, Defendant John Jordan, Defendant Ruth A. Dickerson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against al l Defendants based on the suspension of religious services are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to all remaining claims except Plaintiff's official-capac ity claims challenging the postcard-only policy. (Doc. No. 58.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, the parties shall submit a joint proposed schedule for the remainder of litigation on Pla intiff's official-capacity claims challenging the postcard-only policy. The schedule shall include a proposed date for referral to alternative dispute resolution ("ADR"), if appropriate, and a proposed trial setting. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that on Wednesday, March 23, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., the Court shall hold a status conference in chambers to discuss the parties' joint proposed schedule. Any counsel may participate in the conference by telephone, if counsel notifies the offic e of the undersigned of his or her intent to do so at least twenty-four(24) hours in advance of the scheduled conference. (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 3/11/2016, Status Conference set for 3/23/2016 02:00 PM in Chambers before District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/26/16. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall comply with the Court's June 26, 2014 Order, and if he fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this action, without prejudice and without further notice to him. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/3/14. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Harker, 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Harker. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s m otion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for leave to add party-plaintiffs [Docs. #5, #10, #11, and #12] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment ofcounsel [Doc. #6] is DENIED, without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit an amendedcomplaint, in accordance with the instructions set forth in this Memorandum andOrder, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this M emorandum and Order. Plaintiff is advised that his failure to comply with this Order will result of the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall mail to plaintiff three blank form complaints for the filing of a prisoner civil rights complaint. Plaintiff may request additional forms from the Clerk, as needed.( Response to Court due by 6/9/2014.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/9/14. (CSG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
