Tinsley v. Covenant Care Services, LLC et al
||Covenant Care Services, LLC, Warren Reagan, Rebecca Reagan and Chris Reagan
||March 10, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||Cape Girardeau Office
||Stephen N. Limbaugh
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 2
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 12, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 116 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability and Liquidated Damages, and Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Tyral Tinsley, 124 MOTION for Leave to Amend Answer to the Third Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Chris Reagan, Defendant Warren Reagan, Defendant Covenant Care Services, LLC, Defendant Rebecca Reagan, 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Chris Reagan, Defendant Warren Reagan, Defendant Covenant Care Services, LLC, Defendant Rebecca Reagan. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to the Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 124) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72) is granted. A separate Judgment in favor of Defendants will accompany this Memorandum and Order. This Judgment does not apply to former and current employees who opted out of the class action lawsuit (their names are listed in the Notice of Filing Opt Out (Doc. 146) filed on December 15, 2016). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Liability and Liquidated Damages (Doc. 116) is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 1/12/17. (CSG)
|February 2, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72) is granted in part and denied in part. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff Janet Cargills claims. Summary judgment is deni ed as to the issue of preemption. A separate Partial Judgment will be issued on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Request to Continue Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(d) (Doc. 84) is granted. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is stayed as to Defendants defenses of exemption and good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following briefing schedule shall apply: Plaintiffs shall file their Response to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on March 15, 2016. Defendants shall file their Reply on March 29, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 61) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tyral Tinsley is designated as representativeof the class. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The Owens Law Firm and the Employee & Labor Law Group of Kansas City are appointed as class counsel.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall confer and attempt to reachagreement with respect to a proposed form of class no tice. Within 14 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed notice, reflecting issuesif anyon which they are unable to reach agreement ( Response to Court due by 2/16/2016.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 2/2/16. (MRS)
|March 27, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Conditional Certification Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. ' 216(b) (Doc. 44) is granted. The parties' Agreed Order for Opt-In Procedure and Notice for the Conditionally Certified Class shall be entered separately on this date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 3/27/2015. (JMC)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?