Bell v. Ste. Genevieve County et al
Joshua Aaron Bell |
Ste. Genevieve County, St. Francois County, Michael Bauer, Chris Roemer, Gary J. Stolzer, Dan Bullock and Allen Wells |
1:2014cv00094 |
June 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Cape Girardeau Office |
St. Genevieve |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Joshua Aaron Bell; motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $3.27 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue, because the pleadings are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B).A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.(Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 11/25/2015.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/26/15. (CSG) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Reconsideration re 16 Order on Motion to Reopen Case, filed by Plaintiff Joshua Aaron Bell; motion is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before October 8, 2015, plaintiff shall either pay the enti re $400 filing fee, or he shall file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of his prison account statement for past six-months. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Cour t=s form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with this Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form on or before October 8, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. (Response to Court due by 10/8/2015.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/9/15. (CSG) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending final disposition of the above-referenced criminal charges currently pending against plaintiff in Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri. See Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 397 (2007). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing concerning the final disposition of the above-referenced state criminal charges pending against him, no later than thirty (30) days after final disposit ion of the state charges; plaintiff shall include the names of the parties, the court in which the case was pending, and the case number. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending final disposition of the state criminal charges against plaintiff, and may be reopened by plaintiff's filing of a motion to reopen the case after such final disposition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED without prejudice. A separate order to stay and administratively close this case shall accompany this memorandum and order. Response to Court due by 7/28/2014. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/27/14. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.